Anesthetic Monitoring and Equipment: To Trust or Not To Trust?

Gianluca Bini, DVM MRCVS DACVAA

Monitoring anesthetized patients is critical for ensuring safety and optimizing outcomes. This lecture explores the reliability of various monitoring equipment, potential pitfalls, and practical considerations for veterinary anesthetic monitoring.

1. Importance of Anesthetic Monitoring

  • Minimum technical standards for monitoring anesthetized patients were established by the ASA in 1985 and are periodically updated.

  • Anesthesia mortality rates in human improved from the 1 in 3000  deaths in 1985 to 1 in 400000 in 2021

  • Anesthesia mortality rates are 1 in 600 dogs, 1 in 400 cats and 1 in 100 horses, those rates in veterinary medicine have remained stagnant over the years highlighting the need for more vigilant monitoring.

2. Electrocardiography (ECG)

  • Function: Detects electrical activity of the heart.

  • Common Issues:

    • Double/triple counting of HR due to tall P or T waves.

    • Artifacts that may mask arrhythmias.

    • Low frequency interference, caused by:

      • Patient respiration

      • Patient movement 

    • High frequency interference, caused by:

      • muscle fasciculations

      • Shivering

      • Electrical equipment in the area:

      • Electrosurgery units 

      • Cellphones 

      • MRIs

      • Flexible bronchoscopes or endoscopes

      • Nerve stimulators 

    • Risk of burns from improper grounding when using electrosurgical units, when using esophageal ECG probes

  • Best Practices:

  • Use pulse oximeter or arterial line to confirm pulse rate.

  • Ensure electrodes are correctly placed and hydrated.

  • Be cautious when interpreting results from multi-parametric monitors, they are not made to accurately diagnose abnormal electrical activity.

  • Studies show that arrhythmias can be common in anesthetized animals, even in healthy individuals.

3. Blood Pressure Monitoring

  • Methods:

    • Invasive blood pressure: Gold standard, invasive because need an arterial catheter

      • Overdamping

        • Caused by: Air bubbles, clots or kinks in the tubing

        • Results in: Underestimation of systolic arterial pressure (SAP), overestimation of diastolic arterila pressure (DIA), narrowed pulse pressure but mean arterial pressure (MAP) is not impacted

      • Underdamping

        • Caused by: An arterial catheter that is too rigid or tachydysrhythmias

        • Results in: Overestimation of systolic arterial pressure (SAP), underestimation of diastolic arterila pressure (DIA), wider pulse pressure but mean arterial pressure (MAP) is not impacted

    • Oscillometric Devices: Provide estimates of MAP with variable accuracy depending on the device.

    • Doppler Ultrasonography: Generally measures systolic pressure but may approximate MAP in cats. Doppler provided values that are not accurate in dogs weighing < 5 kg, while in cats doppler was found to be a poor predictor of both direct systolic and mean arterial BP.

  • Best Practices:

    • Ensure cuff placement is appropriate: medial front limb, lateral above the hock, or ventral tail.

    • Cuff width should be ~40% of limb circumference.

    • Verify readings with direct arterial measurement when possible.

4. Pulse Oximetry

  • Mechanism: Measures arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) using light absorption differences between oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin.

  • Most common probes: transmission (light crosses the tissue and is detected on the other side) and reflectance (light is reflected and then detected)

  • Common sources of errors:

    • Poor peripheral perfusion due to hypotension or hypothermia.

    • Arrhythmias or venous pulsations leading to false readings.

    • Movement artifacts and improper probe positioning.

  • Arterial compression caused by the sphygmomanometer cuff.

  • Best Practices:

    • Ensure proper probe placement with good tissue contact.

    • Recognize that SpO2 readings lag behind actual blood oxygen changes due to the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve.

5. Capnography

  • Function: Measures end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) to assess ventilation and metabolic status.

  • Clinical Importance:

    • Detects hypercapnia/hypocapnia and esophageal intubation.

    • Allows to detect if the ET-Tube is too deep

    • In humans esophageal intubation occurs up to 68% of the times, leading to cardiovascular instability, hypoxemia and death

    • In humans, professional liability insurance closed-claims analysis found that capnometry plus pulse-ox could potentially prevent 93% of avoidable anesthetic mishaps

  • Common Issues 

    • Can identify increasing mechanical dead space, exhausted CO2 absorbent, or faulty unidirectional valves.

    • Too much moisture in the line can lead to wrong readings

    • Needs to be calibrated every year with your vaporizer

  • Best Practices:

    • Calibrate equipment regularly.

    • Empty water traps daily and replace moisture tubing as needed.

6. Practical Considerations for Reliable Monitoring

  • Always correlate machine readings with clinical assessment.

  • Regularly maintain and calibrate equipment to ensure accuracy.

  • Train staff to recognize false readings and troubleshoot common issues.

  • Have backup monitoring methods available in case of equipment failure.

Conclusion

While monitoring equipment is invaluable in anesthesia, it is not infallible. Understanding the limitations of each device and integrating clinical assessment with technology ensures the safest anesthetic management for veterinary patients.


References

Bartholomew, K. J. (2024). Electrocardiography. In Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia, The 6th Edition of Lumb and Jones (6th ed., pp. 187–196). Wiley-Blackwell.

Odette, O. (2024). Blood pressure. In Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia, The 6th Edition of Lumb and Jones (6th ed., pp. 197–209). Wiley-Blackwell. 

Acierno, M. J., Brown, S., Coleman, A. E., Jepson, R. E., Papich, M., Stepien, R. L., & Syme, H. M. (2020). ACVIM consensus statement: guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats. Journal of Japanese association of veterinary nephrology and urology, 12(1), 30-49.

Kennedy MJ, Barletta M. Agreement between Doppler and invasive blood pressure monitoring in anesthetized dogs weighing < 5 kg. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2015;51:300–305. 

Moll X, Aguilar A, Garcia F, Ferrer R, Andaluz A. Validity and reliability of Doppler ultrasonography and direct arterial blood pressure measurement in anaesthetized dogs weighing less than 5 kg. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2018;45:135–144.

da Cunha AF, Saile K, Beaufrère H, Wolfson W, Seaton D, Acierno MJ. Measuring the level of agreement between values obtained by directly measured blood pressure and ultrasonic Doppler flow detector in cats. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2014;24:272–278.

Acierno MJ, Seaton D, Mitchell MA, da Cunha A. Agreement between directly measured blood pressure and pressures obtained with three veterinary-specific oscillometric units in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010;237:402–406.

Rysnik MK, Cripps P, Iff I. A clinical comparison between noninvasive blood pressure monitor using high definition oscillometry (Memodiagnostic MD 15/90 Pro) and invasive arterial blood pressure measurement in anaesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2013;40:503–511.

Seliskar A, Zrimsek P, Sredensek J, Petrič AD. Comparison of high definition oscillometric and Doppler ultrasound devices with invasive blood pressure in anaesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2013;40:21–27.

Vachon C, Belanger MC, Burns PM. Evaluation of oscillometric and Doppler ultrasonic devices for blood pressure measurements in anesthetized and conscious dogs. Res Vet Sci. 2014;97:111–117. 

Shih A, Robertson S, Vigani A, da Cunha A, Pablo L, Bandt C. Evaluation of an indirect oscillometric blood pressure monitor in normotensive and hypotensive anesthetized dogs. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2010;20:313–318.

Acierno MJ, Fauth E, Mitchell MA, da Cunha A. Measuring the level of agreement between directly measured blood pressure and pressure readings obtained with a veterinary-specific oscillometric unit in anesthetized dogs. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2013;23:37–40.

Zwijnenberg RJ, del Rio CL, Cobb RM, Ueyama Y, Muir WW. Evaluation of oscillometric and vascular access port arterial blood pressure measurement techniques versus implanted telemetry in anesthetized cats. Am J Vet Res. 2011;72:1015–1021.

Skelding A, Valverde A. Review of non-invasive blood pressure measurement in animals: Part 2 - Evaluation of the performance of non-invasive devices. Can Vet J. 2020 May;61(5):481-498.

McMurphy RM, Stoll MR, McCubrey R. Accuracy of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor during phenylephrine induced hypertension in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2006;67:1541–1545.

Pedersen KM, Butler MA, Ersbøll AK, Pedersen HD. Evaluation of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor for use in anesthetized cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;221:646–650. 

Deflandre CJA, Hellebrekers LJ. Clinical evaluation of the Surgivet V60046, a noninvasive blood pressure monitor in anaesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2008;35:13–21. 

Drynan EA, Raisis AL. Comparison of invasive versus noninvasive blood pressure measurements before and after hemorrhage in anesthetized greyhounds using the Surgivet 9203. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2013;23:523–531. 

Cremer J,  da Cunha A,  Aulakh K,  Liu C, Acierno MJ. Validation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor Vet20 SunTech in anesthetized healthy cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 2020 May;47(3):309-314

Acierno, M.J., Brown, S.A., Coleman, A.E., Jepson, R.E., Papich, M.G., Stepien, R.L., & Syme, H.M. (2018). ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 32, 1803 - 1822.

Russotto, V., Myatra, S. N., Laffey, J. G., Tassistro, E., Antolini, L., Bauer, P., Lascarrou, J. B., Szuldrzynski, K., Camporota, L., Pelosi, P., Sorbello, M., Higgs, A., Greif, R., Putensen, C., Agvald-Öhman, C., Chalkias, A., Bokums, K., Brewster, D., Rossi, E., Fumagalli, R., … INTUBE Study Investigators (2021). Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries. JAMA, 325(12), 1164–1172.


Continue Reading

Next
Next

Anesthetic Roller Coasters: How to Improve Anesthetic Stability?